In-silico Analysis of Potential Phytochemicals against VP39 Methyltransferase of Monkeypox virus

Authors

  • Aiman Aftab Department of Life Sciences, School of Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore Author
  • Rana Mateen University of Management and Technology, Lahore Author
  • Muhammad Sohail Afzal University of Management and Technology Lahore Author

Keywords:

In-silico study, Monkeypox virus (MPXV)), VP39 Methyltransferase (MTase), molecular docking, Density functional theory (DFT)

Abstract

Background: Monkeypox virus (MPXV), a zoonotic orthopoxvirus, has emerged as a global health concern, especially after the 2022 outbreak. Despite the rising prevalence, no drug has been specifically designed to treat MPXV. The VP39 methyltransferase (MTase) plays a vital role in mRNA capping, assisting the virus in immune evasion and replication, making it a promising antiviral target.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify natural phytochemical inhibitors against VP39 MTase of MPXV using computational drug discovery techniques, including molecular docking and density functional theory (DFT).

Methods: The crystal structure of VP39 MTase (PDB ID: 8cer) was obtained and validated using ERRAT, Verify3D, and PROCHECK. A total of 17,967 phytochemicals from the IMPPAT 2.0 database were screened based on ADMET properties and drug-likeness rules (Lipinski’s and Veber’s). Ninety-six compounds passed these filters and were docked using AutoDock Vina. The top ten ligands with the lowest binding energies were selected for further analysis, including interaction profiling and DFT evaluation to determine their chemical reactivity.

Results: The VP39 MTase structure was verified to be of high quality, with 93.5% of residues in the most favored regions. Among the 96 screened compounds, Hispidin (PubChem ID: 54685921) showed the lowest binding energy (-7.6 kcal/mol). Interaction analysis revealed multiple favorable interactions with active site residues. DFT analysis demonstrated a low HOMO-LUMO energy gap (ΔE = 0.12726 eV), suggesting high reactivity and potential as an effective inhibitor.

Conclusion: Hispidin emerged as a potent phytochemical candidate against VP39 MTase, showing strong binding affinity and favorable electronic properties. These findings provide a promising basis for further in vitro, in vivo, and molecular dynamics studies to develop novel anti-MPXV therapies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Ferdous J, Barek MA, Hossen MS, Bhowmik KK, Islam MS. A review on monkeypox virus outbreak: New challenge for world. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6(1):e1007.

. Ghaseminia M. Preventing monkeypox outbreaks: Focus on diagnosis, care, treatment, and vaccination. J Clin Translat Sci. 2023;7(1):e60.

. de la Calle-Prieto F, Estébanez Muñoz M, Ramírez G, Díaz-Menéndez M, Velasco M, Azkune Galparsoro H, et al. Treat-ment and prevention of monkeypox. Treatment and prevention of monkeypox. Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.). 2023;41(10):629-34.

. Khani E, Afsharirad B, Entezari-Maleki T. Monkeypox treatment: Current evidence and future perspectives. J Med Virol. 2023;95(1):e28229.

. Gupta AK, Talukder M, Rosen T, Piguet V. Differential Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of mpox (Monkeypox): A Review for Dermatologists. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Jul;24(4):541-56.

. de la Calle-Prieto F, Estébanez Muñoz M, Ramírez G, Díaz-Menéndez M, Velasco M, Azkune Galparsoro H, et al. Treat-ment and prevention of monkeypox. Treatment and prevention of monkeypox. Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.). 2023;41(10):629-34.

. Goyal L, Ajmera K, Pandit R, Pandit T. Prevention and Treatment of Monkeypox: A Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Professionals and General Population. Cureus. 2022;14(8): DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28230.

. Patel M, Adnan M, Aldarhami A, Bazaid AS, Saeedi NH, Alkayyal AA, et al. Current Insights into Diagnosis, Prevention Strategies, Treatment, Therapeutic Targets, and Challenges of Monkeypox (Mpox) Infections in Human Populations. Life. 2023;13(1):249.

. Shuvo PA, Roy A, Dhawan M, Chopra H, Emran T Bin. Recent outbreak of monkeypox: Overview of signs, symp-toms, preventive measures, and guideline for supportive man-agement. Int J Surg. 2022;105:106877.

. Hossain FMA, Bappy MNI, Robin TB, Ahmad I, Patel H, Jahan N, et al. A review on computational studies and bioin-formatics analysis of potential drugs against monkeypox virus. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2024;42(12):6091–107.

. Bajrai LH, Alharbi AS, El-Day MM, Bafaraj AG, Dwivedi VD, Azhar EI. Identification of Antiviral Compounds against Monkeypox Virus Profilin-like Protein A42R from Plantago lanceolata. Molecules. 2022 N;27(22).

. Naveed M, Shabbir MA, Ain NU, Javed K, Mahmood S, Aziz T, et al. Chain-Engineering-Based De Novo Drug Design against MPXVgp169 Virulent Protein of Monkeypox Virus: A Molecular Modification Approach. Bioengineering. 2023 ;10(1):11.

. Mohapatra RK, Mahal A, Mohapatra PK, Sarangi AK, Mishra S, Alsuwat MA, et al. Structure-based discovery of F. religiosa phytochemicals as potential inhibitors against Mon-keypox (mpox) viral protein. J Biosaf Biosecur. 2024;6(3):157–69.

. Pastula DM, Tyler KL. An Overview of Monkeypox Virus and Its Neuroinvasive Potential. Ann Neurol. 2022;92(4):527-31.

. Ali Y, Imtiaz H, Tahir MM, Gul F, Saddozai UAK, ur Rehman A, et al. Fragment-Based Approaches Identified Te-covirimat-Competitive Novel Drug Candidate for Targeting the F13 Protein of the Monkeypox Virus. Viruses. 2023;15(2):570.

. Hraib M, Jouni S, Albitar MM, Alaidi S, Alshehabi Z. The outbreak of monkeypox 2022: An overview. Ann Med Surg. 2022;79:104069.

. Hatmal MM, Al-Hatamleh MAI, Olaimat AN, Ahmad S, Hasan H, Ahmad Suhaimi NA, et al. Comprehensive literature review of monkeypox. Emerg Microb Infect. 2022;11(1):2600-31.

. Bajrai LH, Alharbi AS, El-Day MM, Bafaraj AG, Dwivedi VD, Azhar EI. Identification of Antiviral Compounds against Monkeypox Virus Profilin-like Protein A42R from Plantago lanceolata. Molecules. 2022;27(22):7718.

. Abouzied AS, Huwaimel B, Alqarni S, Younes KM, Alshammari RE, Alshammari AH, et al. Sinefungin analogs targeting VP39 methyltransferase as potential anti-monkeypox therapeutics: a multi-step computational approach. Mol Divers. 2025;29(1):561-74.

. Thai QM, Phung HTT, Pham NQA, Horng JT, Tran PT, Tung NT, et al. Natural compounds inhibit Monkeypox virus methyltransferase VP39 in silico studies. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2024; https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2024.2321509.

. Subramaniam D, Thombre R, Dhar A, Anant S. DNA methyltransferases: A novel target for prevention and therapy. Front Oncol.2014; https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00080.

. Hodel AE, Gershon PD, Shi X. The 1.85 A ˚ Structure of Vaccinia Protein VP39: A Bifunctional Enzyme That Partici-pates in the Modification of Both mRNA Ends. Cell. 1996;85(2):247-56.

. Hassan AM, Gattan HS, Faizo AA, Alruhaili MH, Alharbi AS, Bajrai LH, et al. Evaluating the Binding Potential and Stability of Drug-like Compounds with the Monkeypox Virus VP39 Protein Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Free Energy Analysis. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17(12):1617.

. Hashim HO, Al-Shuhaib JMB, Mohammed MK, Al-Shuhaib MBS. Targeting Monkeypox Virus Methyltransferase: Virtual Screening of Natural Compounds from Middle-Eastern Me-dicinal Plants. Mol Biotechnol. 2024; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-024-01246-y.

. Vivek-Ananth RP, Mohanraj K, Sahoo AK, Samal A. IMPPAT 2.0: An Enhanced and Expanded Phytochemical Atlas of Indian Medicinal Plants. ACS Omega. 2023;8(9):8827–45.

. Colovos C, Yeates TO. Verification of protein structures: Patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci. 1993;2(9):1511–9.

. Verify3D – UCLA-DOE Institute [Internet]. Available from: https://www.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/verify3d/

. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr. 1993;26(2):283–91.

. Bhattacharjee A, Ahammad I, Chowdhury ZM, Das KC, Keya CA, Salimullah M. Proteome-Based Investigation Iden-tified Potential Drug Repurposable Small Molecules Against Monkeypox Disease. Mol Biotechnol. 2024;66(4):626–40.

. Raen R, Islam MM, Islam R, Islam MR, Jarin T. Functional characterization and structural prediction of hypothetical pro-teins in monkeypox virus and identification of potential inhibitors. Mol Divers. 2024; 70(8):39-49.

. Hosen MI, Mia ME, Islam MN, Khatun MUS, Emon TH, Hossain MA, et al. In-silico approach to characterize the structure and function of a hypothetical protein of Monkeypox virus exploring Chordopox-A20R domain-containing protein activity. Antivir Ther. 2024;29(3).

. Adrees S, Imtiaz A, Yaseen A, Irfan Fareed M, Anwar W, Ashraf A, et al. In-silico analysis of potential anticancer drug for NEK7 and PPP1CA proteins overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2024; https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2024.2318484.

. Shaweta S, Akhil S, Utsav G. Molecular Docking studies on the Anti-fungal activity of Allium sativum (Garlic) against Mucormycosis (black fungus) by BIOVIA discovery studio visualizer 21.1.0.0. Annals of Antivirals and Antiretrovirals. 2021; 5(1):028-32.

. Eberhardt J, Santos-Martins D, Tillack AF, Forli S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings. J Chem Inf Model. 2021;61(8):3891–8.

. Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455–61.

. Wu Q, Peng Z, Zhang Y, Yang J. COACH-D: Improved protein-ligand binding sites prediction with refined ligand-binding poses through molecular docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W438–42.

. Jendele L, Krivak R, Skoda P, Novotny M, Hoksza D. PrankWeb: a web server for ligand binding site prediction and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 ;47(W1):W345–9.

. Sharma A, Roy S, Parijat Tripathi K, Roy P, Mishra M, Khan F, et al. Predicted metal binding sites for phytoremediation. Bioinformation [Internet]. 2009;4(2):66–70. Available from: http://www.cprm.gov.br/pgagem/Manuscripts/jeliazkovaea.ht

. Benet LZ, Hosey CM, Ursu O, Oprea TI. BDDCS, the Rule of 5 and drugability. Vol. 101, Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2016;101:89-98.

. Irvine JD, Takahashi L, Lockhart K, Cheong J, Tolan JW, Selick HE, et al. MDCK (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cells: A tool for membrane permeability screening. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88(1):28–33.

. Kunwittaya S, Nantasenamat C, Treeratanapiboon L, Srisarin A, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul V. Influence of logBB cut-off on the prediction of blood-brain barrier permeability. Biomed Applied Technol J. 2013;1:16-34.

. Bredas JL. Mind the gap! Mater Horiz. 2014;1(1):17-9.

. Frisch A. gaussian 09W Reference. Wallingford, USA, 25p. 2009;470.

. Dagli M, Er M, Karakurt T, Onaran A, Alici H, Tahtaci H. Synthesis, Characterization, Antimicrobial Evaluation, and Computational Investigation of Substituted Imidazo [2, 1‐b][1, 3, 4] thiadiazole Derivatives. Chemistry Select. 2020;5(38):11753-63.

. Ikai A. Thermostability and Aliphatic Index of Globular Proteins. J Biochem. 1980;88(6):1895-8.

. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A Simple Method for Displaying the Hydropathic Character of a Protein. J Mol Biol. 1982;157(1):105-32.

. Plaster NM, Tawil R, Tristani-Firouzi M, Canú S, Saı¨d Bendahhou S, Tsunoda A, et al. Mutations in Kir2.1 Cause the Developmental and Episodic Electrical Phenotypes of Andersen’s Syndrome 17q23 (maximum LOD 3.23 at 0) near the inward rectifying potassium channel gene KCNJ2. A missense Frank A. Fish, 12 Angelika Hahn, 13 Alexandru Nitu, 14 Coskun Ozdemir, 11 Piraye Serdaroglu, 11 mutation in KCNJ2 (encoding D71V) was identified in the linked family. Cell. 2001;105(4):511-9.

. Sib Tul Hassan Shah S, Naeem I. In-silico targeting TMPK from monkey pox virus: Molecular docking analysis, density functional theory studies and molecular dynamic simulation analysis. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2023;41(24):14689–701.

. Naeem I, Mateen RM, Sibtul Hassan S, Tariq A, Parveen R, Saqib MAN, et al. In silico identification of potential drug-like molecules against G glycoprotein of Nipah virus by molecular docking, DFT studies, and molecular dynamic simulation. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2023;41(15):7104–18.

. Kaswa R, Nair A, Von Pressentin KB. South African Family Practice. 2022; Available from: https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.

. Rampogu S, Kim Y, Kim SW, Lee KW. An overview on monkeypox virus: Pathogenesis, transmission, host interaction and therapeutics. Front Cellular Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1076251.

. Yadav AK, Srivastava A, Verma P, Gupta D. A Comprehen-sive Review on Monkeypox Virus Transmission, Pathogenesis, Treatments and its Preventive Measures. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365472703

. Saied ARA, Dhawan M, Metwally AA, Fahrni ML, Choudhary P, Choudhary OP. Disease History, Pathogenesis, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics for Human Monkeypox Dis-ease: A Comprehensive Review. Vaccines. 2022;10(12):2091.

. Mitjà O, Ogoina D, Titanji BK, Galvan C, Muyembe JJ, Marks M, et al. Monkeypox. Lancet. 2023;401(10370):60-74.

. Zahmatyar M, Fazlollahi A, Motamedi A, Zolfi M, Seyedi F, Nejadghaderi SA, et al. Human monkeypox: history, presentations, transmission, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Front Med. 2023;10:1157670.

. Vivek-Ananth RP, Mohanraj K, Sahoo AK, Samal A. IMPPAT 2.0: An Enhanced and Expanded Phytochemical Atlas of Indian Medicinal Plants. ACS Omega. 2023;8(9):8827–45.

Downloads

Published

15-05-2025

How to Cite

1.
In-silico Analysis of Potential Phytochemicals against VP39 Methyltransferase of Monkeypox virus. Chron Biomed Sci [Internet]. 2025 May 15 [cited 2025 Jun. 14];2(2):PID51. Available from: https://cbsciences.us/index.php/cbs/article/view/51

Similar Articles

1-10 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.