Advancements in Avian Genome Engineering: Strategies, Primordial Germ Cell Manipulation, and Emerging Delivery Techniques
Keywords:
Avian, CRISPR, Genome engineering, PGCs, Sperm, TALENAbstract
Genome engineering tools have greatly advanced in the past 5 years, enabling scientists to make accurate modulations to the genome. Systems of delivering these new genome editing tools have been improved in addition to the development of the new tools. Genome engineering instruments are typically deposited to the in vitro fertilized single cell embryos, which are then cultured and implanted to a host animal. This holds no true in the avian species and the alternative procedures have been engineered in genome engineering in birds. The most common is in vitro culturing of primordial germ cells (PGCs), which migrate in the embryonic circulatory system to the developing gonad and colonize the gonad, eventually developing into the gonadocytes that produce sperm or ova. The population can be screened and enriched and then transposed into a recipient embryo, although in culture, the PGCs can be engineered to express new transgenes or alterations in genes. The greatest drawback of PGC culture is that culture procedures cannot be easily interpolated between the avian species; therefore, culture procedures are only reliable on a limited number of species which include the chicken. Two additional newer technologies that appear to be less taxing to a wider range of avian species are direct injection and sperm transfection-assisted gene editing (STAGE). The rationale behind the direct injection technique is the injection of the genome engineering tools into the circulatory system of the developing embryo just before the development stage, when the PGCs are migrating to the gonads. This is facilitated by the combination of the genome engineering equipment with transfection reagents and the transfection of the PGCs in vivo can be done. STAGE is a technique that involves the application of sperm transfection to implant genome engineering vectors into the recently fertilized embryo. Early signs are that each of the two methodologies can be scaled down to attempt use in other bird species than the chicken, but more research in this direction is required.
Downloads
References
[1]. Hellmich R, Sid H, Lengyel K, Flisikowski K, Schlicken-rieder A, Bartsch D, et al. Acquiring resistance against a retroviral infection via CRISPR/Cas9 targeted genome editing in a commercial chicken line. Front Genome Ed. 2020;2:3.
[2]. Liu Y, Xu Z, Zhang Y, Yu M, Wang S, Gao Y, et al. Ma-rek’s disease virus as a CRISPR/Cas9 delivery system to defend against avian leukosis virus infection in chickens. Vet Microbiol. 2020;242:108589.
[3]. Dehdilani N, Yousefi Taemeh S, Goshayeshi L, Dehghani H. Genetically engineered birds; pre-CRISPR and CRISPR era. Biol Reprod. 2022;106:24-46.
[4]. Lee HJ, Yoon JW, Jung KM, Kim YM, Park JS, Lee KY, et al. Targeted gene insertion into Z chromosome of chicken primordial germ cells for avian sexing model develop-ment. FASEB J. 2019;33:8519-29.
[5]. Khan VS, Malik A, Nawaz R, Ahmad F, Fatima M, Masood F, et al. Application of genome editing CRISPR/Cas9 technology for animal diseases treatment. In: Basit A, Khan SA, Muhyuddin S, Mughal MAS, edi-tors. Animal Health and Disease Management. Beijing: Pioneer Page Publishers; 2024. p.19-28.
[6]. Wright M, Choi W, Deng Z, Kim D, Lee K. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of turkey cells using adenoviral delivery. Poult Sci. 2025;104:106096.
[7]. Basit A, Tahir H, Haider Z, Tariq H, Ullah A, Rehman SU. CRISPR/Cas9-based deletion of SpvB gene from Salmo-nella gallinarum leads to loss of virulence in chicken. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:885227.
[8]. Qin C, Jiang S, Xu K, Zhu J, Wang L, Yang W, Xiao F, Yang K, Huang Q, Meng H. One-step genetic modifica-tion by embryonic dorsal aorta injection of adenoviral CRISPR/Cas9 vector in chicken. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:8692.
[9]. Terada T, Fujii S, Yamanishi N, Kajihara R, Watanabe T, Ezaki R, et al. Potential of recombinant avian adeno-associated virus as a viral vector for CRISPR/Cas9 deliv-ery to avian cells. J Virol Methods. 2025;115263.
[10]. Ullah A, Khan M, Akram M, Abdullah M, Sayka, Iqbal I, et al. CRISPR Cas-9 for treatment and control of avian viral diseases: challenges and opportunities. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2024;80:745-65.
[11]. Dweh TJ, Pattnaik S, Sahoo JP. Assessing the impact of meta-genomic tools on current cutting-edge genome engi-neering and technology. Int J Biochem Mol Biol. 2023;14:62.
[12]. Gutiérrez-Arnal J, Marín C. The latent threat in wild birds: Clostridium botulinum. Vet Sci. 2024;11:36.
[13]. Salvesen HA, Byrne TJ, Whitelaw CBA, Hely FS. Simu-lating the commercial implementation of gene-editing for influenza A virus resistance in pigs: An economic and ge-netic analysis. Genes. 2022;13:1436.
[14]. Hernandez-Patlan D, Tellez-Isaias G, Hernandez-Velasco X, Solis-Cruz B. Technological strategies to im-prove animal health and production. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1206170.
[15]. Li K, Liu Y, Xu Z, Zhang Y, Yao Y, Nair V, et al. Preven-tion of avian retrovirus infection in chickens using CRISPR-Cas9 delivered by Marek’s disease virus. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;21:343-353.
[16]. Challagulla A, Jenkins KA, O’Neil TE, Morris KR, Wise TG, Tizard ML, et al. Germline engineering of the chicken genome using CRISPR/Cas9 by in vivo transfection of PGCs. Anim Biotechnol. 2023;34:775-84.
[17]. Koslová A, Kučerová D, Reinišová M, Geryk J, Trefil P, Hejnar J. Genetic resistance to avian leukosis viruses in-duced by CRISPR/Cas9 editing of specific receptor genes in chicken cells. Viruses. 2018;10:605.
[18]. Gao Y, Sun P, Hu D, Tang X, Zhang S, Shi F, et al. Ad-vancements in understanding chicken coccidiosis: From Eimeria biology to innovative control strategies. One Health Adv. 2024;2:6.
[19]. Oboni KA, Hossain MA. Exploring the diversity, propa-gation, impacts, and market dynamics of houseplants: current trends and future prospects. Technol Hortic. 2025;5.
[20]. Kandlbinder A, Peter-Spiess MH, Leeners B, Mollaysa A, Cavazza T, Meier A, et al. Strategies for interdisciplinary human gene editing research: insights from a Swiss pro-ject. CRISPR J. 2025;8:79-88.
[21]. Gumerson JD, Alsufyani A, Yu W, Lei J, Sun X, Dong L, Wu Z, Li T. Restoration of RPGR expression in vivo using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Gene Ther. 2022;29:81-93.
[22]. Raji AA, Aliyu A. Revolutionising avian pathology: The impact of molecular diagnostics. Sokoto J Vet Sci. 2025;23:1-13.
[23]. Hwang YS, Han JY. Transgenesis and genome editing in poultry. In: Application of Genetics and Genomics in Poultry Science. London: IntechOpen; 2018.
[24]. Chapman B. Evaluation of CRISPR-based approaches for precision poultry gene modulation and delivery. 2024.
[25]. Wang D, Zhang F, Gao G. CRISPR-based therapeutic genome editing: Strategies and in vivo delivery by AAV vectors. Cell. 2020;181:136-50.
[26]. Park JS, Lee KY, Han JY. Precise genome editing in poul-try and its application to industries. Genes. 2020;11:1182.
[27]. Mizushima S, Sasanami T, Ono T, Kuroiwa A. Current approaches to and the application of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for avian genome editing. Genes. 2023;14:757.
[28]. Chen PR, White SN, Walker LR, Kapczynski DR, Suarez DL. Genetic resilience or resistance in poultry against avi-an influenza virus: Mirage or reality? J Virol. 2025;e00820-25.
[29]. Miranda Paez A, Chalkowski K, Zohdy S, Willoughby JR. Management of avian malaria in populations of high conservation concern. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:208.
[30]. Chojnacka-Puchta L, Sawicka D. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in a chicken model: current approaches and appli-cations. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:221-9.
[31]. Khwatenge CN, Nahashon SN. Recent advances in the application of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system in poul-try species. Front Genet. 2021;12:627714.
[32]. Shi M, Kawabe Y, Ito A, Kamihira M. Targeted knock-in into the OVA locus of chicken cells using CRISPR/Cas9 system with homology-independent targeted integration. J Biosci Bioeng. 2020;129:363-70.
[33]. Lin N, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang Z. CRISPR/Cas tech-nology in disease prevention and control of aquatic ani-mals. Rev Aquac. 2025;17:e12995.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Open Access Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

